Clinical decision support

Guidelines & calculators

Practice guidelines and risk calculators

Third-party guidelines and prediction tools relevant to extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, each independently verified against PubMed. These are external documents and tools, linked, not reproduced, and not evidence-gated by this site.

Read the access and validation labels. Very few published IBD prediction tools are simultaneously a live free calculator, externally validated, and validated for the decision you are about to make. Where a tool is formula-only, or was validated only in its derivation cohort, that is stated rather than hidden behind a link. 5 further item(s) found by this review are withheld pending clinician sign-off rather than published unverified.

Practice guidelines

Risk calculators and prediction tools

  • Caprini Score for Venous Thromboembolism (2005) live calculatorexternally validatedStratifies postoperative VTE risk in surgical patients to guide prophylaxis intensity and duration; named by ASCRS 2023 as one of the two scores underpinning its risk tiers. Note: Validated broadly but performs POORLY in the exact population this page serves. In laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery AUC was only 0.701 (optimal cut-point 10.5), and there is a well-described ceiling effect: essentially every colorectal/IBD surgical patient scores 'high risk', so the score does not discriminate WITHIN that group. Supporting studies are mostly retrospective and none is IBD-calibrated. ASCRS 2023 endorses risk scores only to enable an informed risk/benefit discussion, not to decide prophylaxis. Do not present it as an IBD tool.
  • Padua Prediction Score for Risk of VTE live calculatorexternally validatedDetermines need for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised MEDICAL (non-surgical) patients; adopted by the ACCP/CHEST guidelines. Note: External validation is genuinely unflattering: in an Israeli cohort of 5,117 patients VTE rates were 0.27% in the high-risk vs 0.28% in the low-risk stratum (p = 0.77), and a retrospective cohort found mandatory Padua scoring increased prophylaxis use with no reduction in VTE or mortality. The Geneva score outperformed it for identifying truly low-risk patients. Critically, a low Padua score can mislead in IBD. The 2021 international consensus (PMID 34453143) prophylaxes ALL hospitalised IBD patients regardless of score, so using Padua to withhold prophylaxis in a flaring IBD admission would contradict guideline advice.
  • PREsTo (Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Risk Estimate Tool) live calculatorexternally validatedPredicts 5-year risk of hepatic decompensation in PSC (machine-learning/gradient-boosting model). · PMID 29742811 Note: Best-discriminating PSC score in its own validation (C-statistic 0.90 in an independent Oslo cohort of ~300, vs Mayo 0.85 and MELD 0.72), but subsequent external cohorts have reported PREsTo performing WORST among available PSC scores. External validation is therefore mixed, not settled. Not validated under age 18 (the calculator says so explicitly). Predicts decompensation only; it does NOT estimate cholangiocarcinoma risk, so it cannot answer the CCA-surveillance question surgeons most often face. Mayo-hosted page carries an educational-use-only disclaimer.
  • Postdischarge VTE risk calculator for inflammatory bowel disease surgery (Schlick/NSQIP) formula only, no calculatorderivation cohort onlyPredicts 30-day post-discharge VTE after colectomy or proctectomy performed for IBD; predicted probabilities ranged 0.2% to 14.3%. · PMID 33077197 Note: The most directly relevant tool for a colorectal surgical audience, and the one most likely to be over-trusted for exactly that reason, but it is DERIVATION-ONLY and has never been externally validated. Built on 18,990 patients with just 199 post-discharge VTE events, so it is at real risk of optimistic overfitting; NSQIP capture is 30-day and administratively coded. No web implementation was found, so it is not usable at the bedside without rebuilding it from the paper. Treat outputs as hypothesis-generating, not decision-grade.

Also on MDCalc

These are established instruments already hosted as free, working calculators by MDCalc. We link them rather than rebuild them. Our own decision-support tools above cover what MDCalc does not, and every link below was verified against MDCalc directly.

Guideline summaries hosted by MDCalc: